MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617574499 · doi:10.12737/5679

Definition of causes of destruction of materials of a bricklaying on sites of facades of buildings under construction of the residential quarter in the residential district "October" of Novocherkassk of the Rostov region.

2014· article· en· W2617574499 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConstruction and Architecture · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicStructural mechanics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCladding (metalworking)MasonryQuarter (Canadian coin)Architectural engineeringForensic engineeringEngineeringCivil engineeringMaterials scienceGeographyComposite materialArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IThis article discusses the problem related to the appearance of defects in masonry cladding layer self-supporting walls of buildings with monolithic concrete frame for example inspection of buildings under construction of residential quarters in the October district of Novocherkassk. As a result of the survey by OOO "STC" identified and described the characteristic defects in the veneering layer self-supporting walls of buildings and identify their causes. Based on the experience of experts, instrumental studies of structural materials, conducted by a certified testing laboratory in materials survey gives an overview of the causes of defects are manifestations of research of other spe-cialists and organizations leading of which is CNIISK. VA Kucherenko. According to the results of the system analysis of detected defects and data instrumental studies, the authors proposed solutions to eliminate the defects and bring the building up to standard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it