MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617582323 · doi:10.11159/htff17.160

Latent-Heat Thermal-Energy Storage in Heat Exchanger with Plain andFinned Tube

2017· article· en· W2617582323 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muris Torlak, Nijaz Delalić

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistarstvo Civilnih Poslova Bosne i Hercegovine
KeywordsHeat exchangerThermal energy storagePlate fin heat exchangerLatent heatTube (container)Materials scienceShell and tube heat exchangerHeat spreaderNuclear engineeringPlate heat exchangerMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsEngineeringComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two design solutions of the heat exchanger containing a material for latent-heat storage are presented. The devices are exposed to controlled energy-charging and -discharging process by virtue of internal water flow. Temperature variations at several monitoring locations are recorded in order to estimate the performance of energy storage and recovery. The experiment confirms that the heat transfer rate in the heat exchanger with fins is significantly larger than in the case of smooth plain tube, which contributes to better storage performance. The unit with plain tube reveals strong temperature gradient in radial direction. In the setup with finned tube, higher temperatures in the storage material as well as shorter charging and discharging times are achieved. Vertical temperature gradient arising during the heating after the phase change indicates development of convective heat transfer in the liquid phase. Melting of the phase-change material, however, turns out to be inhomogeneous yielding remaining solid parts as well as entrapped air bubbles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207