MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617588025 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v9n3p28

The Outstanding Applications of Skeletal Numbers to Chemical Clusters

2017· article· en· W2617588025 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Enos Masheija Rwantale Kiremire

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicHistory and advancements in chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Namibia
KeywordsChemistrySimple (philosophy)Matching (statistics)Skeletal structuresSeries (stratigraphy)AlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceComputer scienceStatisticsMathematicsAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The evolution of the use of the 14/4n series method has resulted in the discovery of skeletal numbers. The skeletal numbers have rendered the testing of the 18-and 8-electron rules much easier and faster. In the same way, they have been very useful in simplifying the categorization of clusters, the prediction of shapes, and the matching of isolobal fragments. Furthermore, the skeletal numbers have made it possible to tentatively assign ligands to individual skeletal elements in such way that the 18- or 8-electron rule is obeyed. Thus, skeletal numbers can be utilized as a simple guide in analyzing and understanding clusters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicHistory and advancements in chemistryFrench-language works237,207