Bibliographic record
Abstract
This volume provides a comprehensive review of the historical and contemporary scientific investigations conducted at the St. Andrews Biological Station (SABS) over its first 100 years.The twelve chapters are replete with detailed descriptions of a wide range of studies and the extensive bibliography and footnotes reflect the depth to which authors have gone to ensure that the legacy of the Biological Station will continue.The book's publication comes close on the heels of the Federal Government decision to close the Station's library along with most other Fisheries and Oceans research libraries, including that of the Pacific Biological Station, SABS' sibling.Hopefully researchers will find this volume a useful link to the significant accomplishments of SABS scientists.The Biological Station was influenced by and served the research needs of many notable scientists and the volume is a veritable whoswho of marine science in Canada.Many of these scientists have research vessels named after them, E.E.Prince, (W.B.) Dawson, Alfred Needler, J.L. Hart.E.E.Prince was named the Dominion Commissioner of Fisheries in 1892 and was the main motivator for establishing the Station.W. Bell Dawson was the head of the Tidal and Current Survey and the first physical oceanographer associated with the Station.A.W.H. Needler conducted oyster research on P.E.I. in the 1920s where he was director of the Ellerslie substation.He was Station director from 1941-1954 during which time Station scientists' role in advising fisheries management grew considerably.He was part of the Canadian delegation that drew up the convention leading to the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".