MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617684008

Gender and Ethnicity and the Division of Labor in the Health Industry: The Political Responsibility of the State

2010· article· en· W2617684008 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marguerite Cognet

Bibliographic record

VenueL Homme et la société · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDivision of labourEthnic groupPoliticsState (computer science)Health carePolitical scienceGender studiesPower (physics)Work (physics)SociologyEconomic growthEconomicsLawEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ethnicity, class and gender are at the crossroads where power relations operate for the benefit of certain social groups and at the expense of others. We will expand on this topic through the results of investigations into the organisation of healthcare work in two distinct societies  : Canada and France. We will study the State’s role in the differences in access to jobs. We will see that the healthcare system changes arising out of the State’s withdrawal and a wish to rationalize costs, which were initiated in Canada and France at the turn of the 90s, are expressed, amongst others, by increased gender effects in the division of healthcare tasks and services. This gender-based division is now accompanied by an ethnicity-based stratification, which follows an international division of labour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.404 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL Homme et la sociétéSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207