NAFTIDROFURYL USE IN MODERATE VASCULAR COGNITIVE DISORDERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prevention of progression to moderate vascular cognitive disorders (MVCD) in dementia is based on medicinal and nonmedicinal correction of major cardiovascular risk factors, at the same time antidementia, vasoactive and nootropic drugs efficiency is not proven. The own experience of use in 30 patients (22 women and 8 men) with MVCD in age from 46 to 75 years (mean age 67,1 ± 6.6 years) of Naftidrofuryl (Duzofarm) at a dose of 100 mg three times a day for 30 days is provided. After a month of treatment a significant improvement of cognitive function by the Montreal scale assessment of mental functions, the alpha-numeric coding test, and emotional state test is established as measured by the hospital scale of anxiety and depression. Good tolerability, absence of significant side effects when using Naftidrofuryl for MVCD are observed. Longer placebo-controlled studies of the effectiveness of Naftidrofuryl in patients with MVCD are needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".