MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617883294 · doi:10.18260/1-2--8034

Using Robus In Electrical And Computer Engineering Education

2024· article· en· W2617883294 on OpenAlexafffundabout
François Michaud, Mario Lucas, G. Lachiver, André Clavet, Jean-Marie Dirand, N. Boutin, Philippe Mabilleau, Jacques Descoteaux

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTeaching and Learning Programming
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsMicroprocessorRobotRoboticsTeamworkComputer scienceCurriculumEngineering educationEngineering managementMultimediaEngineeringArtificial intelligenceSoftware engineeringElectrical engineeringEmbedded systemPedagogyPsychologyManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ROBUS (ROBot University of Sherbrooke) is an autonomous mobile robot designed to facilitate interdisciplinary engineering design in Electrical Engineering (EE) and Computer Engineering (CE).Its primary purpose is to serve as an integrated platform for a project called INGÉNIUS that introduces electrical and computer engineering simultaneously to a large group of first-year undergraduate students registered in these two distinct programs.Divided in thirty-five teams of six or seven, these students are being initiated to various aspects of electrical and computer engineering such as electric circuits, electronics, sensors and actuators, logic circuits and CPLD, microprocessors, real-time C programming, robotics, technical drawing and communication.This way, ROBUS gives hands-on technical and teamwork experiences early in the curriculum.The robot is used in six different courses, and an interdisciplinary team of professors also work together to coordinate these activities.At the end of the second semester, teams participate in a robot competition where the objective is to design an entertainment robot for children with learning disorders.For fourth-year students in EE and CE, ROBUS is used in more advanced undergraduate courses such as Microprocessor Interfaces, Real-Time Systems, Robotics Projects and also in one graduate course on Artificial Intelligence.The projects done in these courses are oriented toward giving more advanced capabilities to ROBUS, help developed complete autonomous robots and to teach specific concepts.This paper gives a description of ROBUS and how it is used in these activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1990.113

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeaching and Learning ProgrammingFrench-language works237,207