MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2617990402 · doi:10.16995/dm.41

Developing an Online Database on a Shoestring: Growing Pains at the Online Medieval Sources Bibliography

2012· article· en· W2617990402 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Morgan Kay, Maryanne Kowaleski

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Medievalist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBibliographyComputer scienceGraduate studentsDatabaseOnline databaseWorld Wide WebLibrary scienceSociologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Online Medieval Sources Bibliography (OMSB) is a database of modern editions of medieval primary sources. This paper discusses the computing, financing, and logistical challenges we faced in creating the database, as well as our solutions. The OMSB is aimed at a wide audience, from high school students to professors, so we have had to tailor our data to the needs of many different types of researcher, and to keep in mind all of the different ways someone might search for sources. Working with a very limited budget, we have made use of graduate and undergraduate students to provide both programming and data entry, a solution that has provided excellent research experience (and often much-needed funding) for the students involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital MedievalistSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207