Bailout technique to remove a distal protection device(‘Filtrap’) when the retrieval and delivery catheters couldnot pass through the deployed stent
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Honda T, Misumi I. Bailout technique to remove a distal protection device (‘Filtrap’) when the retrieval and delivery catheters could not pass through the deployed stent. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2017;13(2):157-159. doi:10.5114/pwki.2017.67992. APA Honda, T., & Misumi, I. (2017). Bailout technique to remove a distal protection device (‘Filtrap’) when the retrieval and delivery catheters could not pass through the deployed stent. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 13(2), 157-159. https://doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2017.67992 Chicago Honda, Tsuyoshi, and Ikuo Misumi. 2017. "Bailout technique to remove a distal protection device (‘Filtrap’) when the retrieval and delivery catheters could not pass through the deployed stent". Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 13 (2): 157-159. doi:10.5114/pwki.2017.67992. Harvard Honda, T., and Misumi, I. (2017). Bailout technique to remove a distal protection device (‘Filtrap’) when the retrieval and delivery catheters could not pass through the deployed stent. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 13(2), pp.157-159. https://doi.org/10.5114/pwki.2017.67992 MLA Honda, Tsuyoshi et al. "Bailout technique to remove a distal protection device (‘Filtrap’) when the retrieval and delivery catheters could not pass through the deployed stent." Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, vol. 13, no. 2, 2017, pp. 157-159. doi:10.5114/pwki.2017.67992. Vancouver Honda T, Misumi I. Bailout technique to remove a distal protection device (‘Filtrap’) when the retrieval and delivery catheters could not pass through the deployed stent. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2017;13(2):157-159. doi:10.5114/pwki.2017.67992.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".