MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2618373354 · doi:10.5539/jgg.v9n2p11

Spatio-Temporal Growth of Benin City, Nigeria, and Its Implications for Access to Infrastructure

2017· article· en· W2618373354 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Toju. F. Balogun, Andrew G Onokerhoraye

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geography and Geology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and Rural Development Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevenueSustainabilityPopulationGovernment (linguistics)GeographyBusinessNeighbourhood (mathematics)SubdivisionPopulation growthPublic infrastructurePaceEnvironmental planningEconomic growthSocioeconomicsFinanceEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study looks at population growth, spatial expansion and its implications on access to public infrastructure in Benin City. Remote Sensing and GPS were used to generate data for the study. Image processing was carried out with ENVI to assess the spatio-temporal growth of Benin City while ArcGIS was used for neighbourhood analysis of residents’ access to public facilities. The study reveals that there is a strong positive relationship between population and built-up area with correlation coefficient of 0.794 at p=0.05level. It further reveals that both the population and spatial growth of Benin City are faster than the pace of infrastructure provision and that the lag between the growth of Benin City and infrastructure provision is impacting negatively on the quality of lives of the residents and threatens the sustainability of urban environment. To bridge the infrastructure gap the study suggests that alternative sources of fund other than federal allocation be sought for, as the capacity of the urban government to finance infrastructure within the current available revenue is limited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geography and GeologySame topicUrban and Rural Development ChallengesFrench-language works237,207