MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2618399631

BUILDING BRIDGES FOR WELLNESS THROUGH COUNSELLING AND PSYCHOTHERAPY

2008· article· en· W2618399631 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lina Shuja

Bibliographic record

VenueMarket Forces · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)MulticulturalismPreferenceDiversity (politics)TranspersonalSociologyPsychotherapistMedical educationPsychologyPedagogyMedicineGeographyAnthropologyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International Conference, “Building Bridges for Wellness through Counselling and Psychotherapy” was held at the Garden City Bangalore, India in the second week of January 2008. This conference was a collaborative initiative of Ontario Institute for Studies in Education–University of Toronto, Bangalore University-India and Sampurna Montfort College–Bangalore India. The conference aimed at sharing research and practice in counseling and psychotherapy including traditional healing practices within a context of multiculturalism and diversity. The preference was to integrate the religious, spiritual and transpersonal approaches in theory and practice for the counselors and psychotherapists worldwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.731

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarket ForcesSame topicReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207