Exploration des facteurs qui influencent la pratique des infirmières auprès des familles vivant un deuil périnatal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Perinatal loss is a complex phenomenon with multiple dimensions and represents a professional challenge for nurses. There are as many different ways of coping with bereavement as there are parents, and nurses must adapt their intervention in order to adequately support grieving parents. PURPOSE: This qualitative study explored the factors that influence nursing practice with bereaved families in a secondary obstetric care center in Quebec. METHODS: Guba and Lincoln's fourth generation evaluation approach was used. Ten nurses participated in this qualitative study. Data collection was performed using semi-structured interviews. Validation interviews were conducted with three nurses and two gynecologists. The analysis was performed within the perspective of Watson's theory of caring. RESULTS: A thematic analysis was performed and five themes were identified: the relational quality between the nurse and the family, personal characteristics of the nurse, the feelings expressed by nurses, the working environment, and the context in which the nursing care is provided to the family. CONCLUSION: In light of the results, some aspects of nursing practice should be encouraged in order to assure adequate support is provided to grieving families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".