Synthesis and reductive chemistry of bimetallic and trimetallic rare-earth metallocene hydrides with (C5H4SiMe3)1− ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reductive chemistry of [Cp'2Ln(μ–H)(THF)x]y [Ln = Y, Dy, Tb; Cp' = (C5H4SiMe3)1−; x = 2, 0 and y = 2, 3] was examined to determine if these hydrides would be viable precursors for 4fn5d1 Ln2+ ions that could form 5d1-5d1 metal–metal bonded complexes. The hydrides were prepared by reaction of the chlorides, [Cp'2Ln(μ–Cl)]2, 1-Ln, with allylmagnesium chloride to form the allyl complexes, [Cp'2Y(η3–C3H5)(THF)], 2-Ln, which were hydrogenolyzed. The solvent-free reaction of solid 2-Ln with 60 psi of H2 gas in a Fischer-Porter apparatus produced, in the Y case, the trimetallic species, [Cp'2Y(μ–H)]3, 3-Y, and in the Dy and Tb cases, the bimetallic complexes [Cp'2Ln(μ–H)(THF)]2, 4-Ln (Ln = Dy, Tb). The latter complexes could be converted to 3-Dy and 3-Tb by heating under vacuum. Isopiestic data indicate that 3-Y solvates to 4-Y in THF. Reductions of 4-Y, 4-Dy, and 4-Tb with KC8 in the presence of a chelate such as 2.2.2-cryptand or 18-crown-6 all gave reaction products with intense dark colors characteristic of Ln2+ ions. In the yttrium case, with either chelating agent, the dark green product gives a rhombic EPR spectrum (g1 = 2.01, g2 = 1.99, g3 = 1.98, A = 24.1 G) at 77 K. However, the only crystallographically-characterizable products obtainable from these solutions were Ln3+ polyhydride anion complexes of composition, [K(chelate)]{[Cp'2Ln(μ–H)]3(μ–H)}. Reduction of 1-Y with KC8 in the presence of 2.2.2-cryptand also yields an intensely colored product with an axial EPR spectrum (gx = gy = 2.05, Ax = Ay = 35.5 G; gz = 2.07, Az = 34.5) similar to that of (Cp'3Y)1− ion, but crystals were not obtained from this system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".