O consumo em questão: você é acumulador ou desapegado? Um debate intercultural.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo: Este estudo traz uma proposta de reflexão em torno do consumo desenfreado de produtos entre estudantes de um contexto intercultural. A atividade integra o Programa de Extensão Cinema, Cultura e o Mundo do Trabalho do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Rio Grande do Sul (IFRS) – Campus Porto Alegre e visa a complementar a formação dos estudantes de sua comunidade interna e participantes da comunidade externa com a realização de ações de extensão que tratam de temas que envolvem aspectos interculturais para o aprendizado de língua estrangeira e literatura. O estudo foi aplicado em dois grupos: um no contexto brasileiro e outro no canadense, por meio do uso de materiais de ensino como vídeos de curta-metragem. Especificamente, buscou-se conhecer como esses grupos procedem em relação ao acúmulo ou descarte objetos pessoais. Procurou-se, também, identificar os motivos que levam os entrevistados a manter ou descartar seus objetos pessoais. Paralelamente, esta ação procurou promover o intercâmbio cultural entre os seus participantes, tanto pelo desenvolvimento linguístico (interação entre falantes da língua portuguesa e inglesa), como pela promoção do conhecimento de diferentes costumes e hábitos das duas comunidades. Palavras-chave: Língua Inglesa. Cinema. Educação. CONSUMPTION IN QUESTION: ARE YOU A CLUTTERER OR A DETACHED PERSON? AN INTERCULTURAL DEBATE Abstract: The Program Film, Culture and the World of Word, from the Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Sul (IFRS) – Campus Porto Alegre, aims at providing complementary education to students by the promotion of activities of extention to outside members of the academic community, dealing with themes that involve intercultural aspects to the leaning of foreign language and literature. In this study, one of these activities, hold along 2015, is presented in which people were invited to discuss about the uncontrolled consumption that characterizes our society nowadays. The teaching material used were short-film videos. The study was applied to two groups of students: one in the Brazilian context and the other a Canadian one. Specifically, this study tried to identify the motives that make people keep or get rid of personal belongings. Parallel to this, the study tried to promote an exchange among students, at the linguistic level (speakers of Portuguese and English), as well as at the cultural level by exposing different habits across both communities. Keywords: English Language. Films. Education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".