MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reseña: Mercedes Blanco, Góngora heroico. Las Soledades y la tradición épica.

2014· article· es· W261858404 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
MaÁngeles Garrido Berlanga

Bibliographic record

VenueEntrehojas Revista de Estudios Hispánicos · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSpanish Literature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen: El título de esta publicación de Mercedes Blanco plantea, ya desde su enunciado, Góngora heroico. Las Soledades y la tradición épica, una atractiva cuestión que encuentra el espacio idóneo para su discusión y refutación a lo largo de las páginas que componen la edición. Explicar la relación que las Soledades de Luis de Góngora mantiene con la épica es el objeto principal que trata su autora en la obra. Abstract: The title of the book of Mercedes Blanco titled Góngora heroico. Las Soledades y la tradición épica, poses an attractive question is the ideal space for discussion and rebuttal along the pages that make editing. Explain the relationship Soledades of Luis de Góngora maintains the epic is the main object that is the author's work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntrehojas Revista de Estudios HispánicosSame topicSpanish Literature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207