MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2618670552 · doi:10.2307/j.ctv18ph0kd

La cité coopérative canadienne-française

2011· book· fr· W2618670552 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean–Pierre Collin

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l'Université du Québec eBooks · 2011
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au milieu des annees 1950, dans la municipalite rurale de Saint-Leonard-de-Port-Joli, la Cooperative d'habitation de Montreal construit plus de 650 maisons unifamiliales pour ses membres. A travers elle, les syndicats nationaux, l'Action catholique et le secteur cooperatif travaillent au meme but : procurer a chaque famille sa maison. Ce projet « alternatif » de societe urbaine pour les salaries canadiens-francais illustre l'atmosphere sociopolitique du Quebec entre la Grande Depression et la Revolution tranquille. Au cours de cet episode marquant du developpement urbain de Montreal se concretise l'essoufflement du corporatisme social cher a certains milieux nationalistes canadiens-francais devant la modernisation de l'appareil etatique. Parallelement, des formes laicisees d'action communautaire, annoncant l'animation sociale des annees 1960, commencent a surgir. L'auteur a rencontre des artisans de la Cooperative d'habitation de Montreal et constitue une vaste documentation. Il situe, raconte et analyse une periode encore vivante qui interessera, a divers titres, les temoins de l'epoque, les historiens, les intervenants sociaux et le grand public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0110.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l'Université du Québec eBooksSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207