MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2618676391 · doi:10.48075/igepec.v15i3.6298

Notas E Considerações Sobre Migração E A Distribuição Da População No Oeste Do Paraná - 1975 A 2010

2000· article· pt· W2618676391 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInforme GEPEC · 2000
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRural Development and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Estadual do Oeste do ParanáUniversidade Estadual de CampinasConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
KeywordsGeographyHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O objetivo deste artigo é analisar a distribuição da população urbana e rural nos municípios da Região Oeste do Paraná e em relação ao Estado do Paraná (2000 e 2010). Para isso foram utilizados os indicadores de análise regional. Os resultados demonstraram que houve mudanças significativas no padrão de concentração da população, cidades que apresentavam alta concentração de domicílios rurais evidenciam perca desse dinamismo, para os grandes centros. Os municípios de Cascavel, Foz do Iguaçu, Guaíra, Medianeira, Santa Terezinha de Itaipu e Toledo, são os que demonstraram em todas as analises concentração populacional na zona urbana e também os maiores captadores da população de cidades vizinhas, dada atual situação de desenvolvimento e poder de atratividade e assim mantiveram seus patamares de análises anteriores a partir da década de 1970, com alta concentração de domicílios urbanos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it