MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2618711373 · doi:10.21037/apm.2017.05.08

Speedy response can be achieved from palliative radiotherapy in the treatment of painful uncomplicated bone metastases

2017· editorial· en· W2618711373 on OpenAlexaff
Leila Malek, Edward Chow, Charles B. Simone

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Palliative Medicine · 2017
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicManagement of metastatic bone disease
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiation therapyPalliative careRandomized controlled trialBone metastasisPalliative treatmentRadiologySurgeryMetastasisInternal medicineCancerNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2012 update on the systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases identified 25 randomized controlled trials comparing single fraction versus multiple fraction schedules for the palliation of painful uncomplicated bone metastases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0080.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Palliative MedicineSame topicManagement of metastatic bone diseaseFrench-language works237,207