MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2618760041 · doi:10.7202/1039687ar

Vision de chercheur, de clinicien ou de forcené de l’autisme? Laurent Mottron crée sa méthode ICI

2017· article· fr· W2618760041 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Normand Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de psychoéducation · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une première partie de cet article recense le livre récent de Laurent Mottron, L’intervention précoce pour enfants autistes . L’idée porteuse de ce livre est que l’intelligence des autistes les sauve et que l’aide apportée en bas-âge doit se limiter à favoriser l’éclosion de cette intelligence et son déploiement. La recension constate qu’il s’agit non de science, mais de pseudo-science. Une seconde partie de l’article rétablit la bonne perspective : l’autisme est un dérèglement du psychique à géométrie variable qui appelle une intervention directe, formelle, explicite, transformatrice. L’analyse appliquée du comportement demeure la meilleure source pour cette intervention précoce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de psychoéducationSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207