MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2619145325 · doi:10.4103/1673-5374.206661

Correction: The translational importance of establishing biomarkers of human spinal cord injury

2017· erratum· en· W2619145325 on OpenAlexaff
BrianK Kwon, SanamSalimi Elizei

Bibliographic record

VenueNeural Regeneration Research · 2017
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver Spine Surgery Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfusionSpinal cord injuryComputer scienceSpinal traumaNatural language processingPsychologyArtificial intelligenceNeuroscienceSpinal cordPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The online version of this article contained a typographical error in the first author's name. The last name of the first author was incorrectly given as Elizei, and the correct one should be Salimi Elizei. The online version of the original article can be found under doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.202933. Neural Regeneration Research would like to apologize to the authors and readers for the error and any confusion this may have caused.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeural Regeneration ResearchSame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207