Éducation et engagement : La participation de l’École à relever les défis environnementaux et de développement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à proposer des repères théoriques permettant de penser et de dépasser les tensions, voire les contradictions, pouvant exister entre la volonté émancipatrice de l’éducation et la finalité d’engagement. Ces tensions seront examinées selon un cadre de pensée pragmatiste. Après avoir clarifié les principes et les caractéristiques d’un curriculum acceptable pour l’éducation au développement durable, nous examinerons les éléments d’un modèle anthropologique, pédagogique et didactique pour cette éducation. Ces éléments conduiront à proposer un schéma général permettant de rendre opératoire une finalité d’engagement au service d’une citoyenneté éco-responsable dans le cadre de l’institution scolaire. Des indicateurs permettront l’élaboration d’un indice synthétique capable de rendre compte des dynamiques éducatives à l’œuvre dans les projets de développement humain durable menés à l’échelle des établissements scolaires et des territoires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".