The Invisible Irish: Finding Protestants in the Nineteenth Century Migrations to America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Invisible Irish: Finding Protestants in the Nineteenth Century Migrations to America. By Rankin Sherling. (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2016, Pp. xv, 350. $110, cloth; $34.95, paper.)As Rankin Sherling notes at the outset of The Invisible Irish, the history and demography of catholic migration into the United States in the nineteenth century has been far more studied and documented than has been the migration of Protestants. In part, this is because of the determination of catholic migrants to maintain their religion in a society where they were met with obstacles from which protestant migrants were generally exempt. Additionally, the majority of protestant migration from Ireland to the colonies that would become the United States and then to the United States itself occurred in the eighteenth century, a movement well documented by recent historians of history of that period. But there is a more important reason that nineteenth-century protestant immigration from Ireland to the United States has been relatively little studied: There was not that much of it, as Sherling's numbers help show. Indeed, most protestant migration from Ireland to North America went not to the United States but to Canada, where by 1870 there were more than nine-hundred Orange Lodges in Ontario alone, while the best guess for have for Orange Lodges in the United States at that period, mainly in New York and Pennsylvania, is for not much more than forty.The title of Sherling's book hints at a compromise between his original intentions and the facts as he discovered them, but the title misleads. First, as he quickly acknowledges, he's not in search of protestant migrants from Ireland in general but of Presbyterians in particular. Second, he's not looking at America, an imprecise word when used without a preceding geographic indicator (North, Central, or South) and in the singular without the qualification that we are considering the United States. Yet if Sherling had meant to consider more than the United States the book does not do so, adding perhaps to the irony of its publication by a Canadian press. Additionally, many Presbyterians from Ireland had, of course, never considered themselves Irish but as British from the part of the United Kingdom that happened to be Irish, so finding them now and identifying them as Irish is not particularly helpful to understanding their experiences after migration. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".