MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2619311761

Québec : la performance des exploitations agricoles à la suite du transfert intergénérationnel

2011· preprint· fr· W2619311761 on OpenAlexaffabout
Fanny Lepage, Jean‐Pierre Couderc, Jean‐Philippe Perrier, Diane Parent

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2011
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCooperative Studies and Economics
Canadian institutionsCentre de Recherche en Sciences Animales de Deschambault
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfer (computing)BusinessGeographyPolitical scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le transfert des exploitations familiales est une étape cruciale du cycle de vie de la majorité des exploitations agricoles québécoises. Avec un taux élevé d’échec important de 40 à 50 % dans les cinq années suivant le transfert d’une PME, il est important de connaître les causes de ces échecs ainsi que les déterminants de la performance des exploitations survivantes après le cap des premières années. Cet article présente les déterminants financiers et technico-économiques de cette performance en s’appuyant sur trois périodes : le montage financier, l’année du transfert et l’évolution de la situation. Les résultats démontrent que ce sont les ratios technico-économiques de l’exploitation à l’année du transfert et durant la période post-transfert qui ont la plus grande influence sur la performance financière cinq années après.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicCooperative Studies and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207