Les Défis des PME du Sud et du Nord: Vers leur développement durable
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les PME representent la majorite du tissu industriel de la plupart des nations et y creent la majorite des emplois. Elles sont devenues les outils qu'utilisent bien des gouvernements et des partenaires au developpement pour reduire la pauvrete et stimuler et diversifier les economies. Dans une perspective comparative, cet ouvrage etudie l'entrepreneuriat dans trois pays de culture et de niveau economique differents, malgre leur appartenance commune a l'espace de la Francophonie : un pays industrialise et membre du G8, le Canada, un pays emergent et membre de l'Union europeenne, la Roumanie, et un pays en voie de developpement d'Afrique et exportateur de petrole, le Congo Brazzaville. L'etude s'inscrit dans le contexte de l'analyse institutionnelle et integre, notamment, la culture du developpement durable, visant a mettre en evidence l'impact de divers facteurs sur les specificites du comportement entrepreneurial des PME. Les auteurs avancent que la promotion des PME dependra fondamentalement de la capacite a generer des institutions de qualite qui jouent un role determinant dans une meilleure coordination marchande.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".