MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2619396062 · doi:10.3138/md.0861r

Monist Dramaturgy in Strindberg’s <i>The Black Glove</i>

2017· article· en· W2619396062 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sarah Balkin

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPosthumanist Ethics and Activism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonismAlchemyOccultDualismSpiritualismLiteraturePoliticsPhilosophyHistoryArtEpistemologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During his Inferno period (1894–97), August Strindberg studied Ernst Haeckel’s monism, which sought to bring the divine back into Darwinist natural science and proclaimed the unity of all matter. Monism influenced a range of late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century artistic, social, and political movements, including art nouveau, the historical avant-garde, spiritualism and the occult revival, the early women’s and homosexual rights movements, and eugenics. Strindberg’s study of Haeckel’s monism coincided with his alchemical investigations into the transformability of matter. These occult studies altered Strindberg’s dramaturgical approach to human and non-human stage matter, particularly the affective relations among characters, settings, and props. This article tracks Strindberg’s engagement with Haeckel’s ideas and posits nineteenth-century monism as an inverse predecessor to present-day new materialisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicPosthumanist Ethics and ActivismFrench-language works237,207