Sedimentological and stratigraphic characterization of Cretaceous upper McMurray deposits in the southern Athabasca oil sands, Alberta, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Lower Cretaceous McMurray Formation located in northeastern Alberta, Canada, is host to one of the largest bitumen resources in the world. In this paper, we provide an integrated sedimentological and stratigraphic analysis of the upper McMurray member located in the Pike and Jackfish project areas (Townships 73–76 and Ranges 4–7 W4M) of the southern Athabasca oil sands. Using core data, geophysical well logs, and seismic data, two main facies associations (embayment and fluvial) are evident. The embayment deposits were likely sourced by up-dip distributary channels and are commonly expressed in the subsurface as a series of coarsening-upward parasequences. The facies expressions in core range from bioturbated mudstones to wave-rippled sandstones. Noticeable, however, is the fact that there are areas where strata within the parasequences are instead substituted with sand, inclined heterolithic stratification, and mud. These deposits, in the form of fluvial channels with brackish-water overprint, occur at three different parasequence horizons within the study area. The removal of these embayment deposits is believed to be initiated, in part, by halite dissolution of the Middle Devonian Prairie Evaporite Formation deposits during upper McMurray deposition. Notably, the halite dissolution edge on the eastern half of the study area is believed to have created a subregional shelf–slope break during upper McMurray deposition. As such, the distributary channels likely re-equilibrated themselves to the slope created by the salt dissolution edge and thus proceeded to incise into previously deposited upper McMurray parasequence and underlying middle McMurray deposits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".