Langue romane ou romande ? Variété autonome ou bribe de continuum ? Un siècle de construction du francoprovençal dans la Gazette de Lausanne (1875-1988)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le francoprovenal ne compte plus de jeunes locuteurs natifs en France (rgion Rhne-Alpes), mais on en trouve en Italie (Val d'Aoste) et en Suisse (Valais). Cette langue ne au VI e sicle et identifie au XIX e , parfois littraire mais jamais administrative, souvent appele patois, jouit d'un faible prestige. Elle fait cependant l'objet d'un discours collectif qui mrite l'analyse, s'agissant de ses liens avec le provenal, le franais ou l'allemand, de sa disparition ou de sa revitalisation. Pour tudier ses reprsentations en Suisse romande, nous nous appuyons sur les textes de la Gazette de Lausanne dans lesquels apparat le terme franco-provenal, de 1875 1988 (premire et dernire occurrences). Ce terme (accompagn ou non de patois) contribue la construction de diverses communauts imagines, associes la patrie (cantonale ou nationale), la communaut linguistique francophone (face aux germanophones majoritaires) ou une entit transnationale regroupant des rgions suisses, franaises et italiennes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".