L'administration de l'éducation: Une perspective historique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cette deuxieme edition de L’administration de l’education, les auteurs decrivent ce qui, depuis le debut du XXe siecle, a jalonne le developpement du champ d’etudes qu’est l’administration de l’education au Quebec, au Canada, aux Etats-Unis et meme en Europe. Pour ce faire, ils ont depouille nombre de documents – livres, revues et bulletins, communications scientifiques, archives, memoires et theses, annuaires d’universites, bases de donnees – et ont recueilli les propos de pionniers qui ont enseigne l’administration de l’education au Quebec.Cette edition met a jour chacun des chapitres en y apportant une nouvelle perspective de l’enracinement du champ d’etudes au Canada en milieu francophone minoritaire, notamment au Manitoba. Une place est egalement faite a la gestion de la diversite, dans une perspective de gestion inclusive et, enfin, a l’administration de l’education dans le contexte de l’evolution de l’universite quebecoise.Le lecteur y puisera les elements pour une meilleure comprehension des fondements theoriques et pratiques de l’administration de l’education au Quebec. Il y decouvrira comment s’est elaboree la philosophie de formation des gestionnaires de l’education et saisira davantage l’origine des conceptions de la formation, de la recherche, des techniques et des pratiques actuelles de ce domaine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".