“Onion peel” glycodendrimer syntheses using mixed triazine and cyclotriphosphazene scaffolds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An expeditious synthetic protocol for the construction of glycodendrimers is illustrated using the newly discovered “onion peel” strategy. The onion peel approach and orthogonal coupling strategies were accomplished with rationally design sequential modifications of cyanuric acid. Carefully chosen building blocks and their effective attachment by chemoselective atom economical click reactions, namely Cu (I) azide–alkyne cycloaddition reaction (CuAAC) and photocatalyzed thiol-ene reaction (TEC), allowed rapid build-up of glycodendrimers in contrast to traditional dendrimers syntheses that are based on the repetitive use of identical building blocks to form each layer. The newly formed glycodendrimers were evaluated for their capacity to cross-link carbohydrate-lectin interactions using dynamic light scattering (DLS). Rapid increase in particle size was observed as a function of time when compared to their monomer counterparts resulting from the multivalent lectin cross-linking ability of the new glycodendrimers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".