L’Educational Turn. L’éducation comme média artistique: À la recherche d’une interactivité nouvelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: “Educational Turn”, an expression used for a decade by museology and various contemporary art environments, by artists as well as curators (Rogoff, 2008; O’Neill & Wilson (Eds.), 2010; Wilson & O’Neill, 2010; Wesseling (Ed.), 2011). Derived from artistic avant-garde tendencies of the second half of the 20th Century, including institutional critique and relational aesthetics, it immediately brings forward the issues of interactive modalities of the exhibited artwork, public participation, and knowledge dissemination. But this expression actually goes further since the concept of “educational turn” is not only rooted in the artwork as a mediation tool, but to cite Podesva (2007), in education as an artistic medium, fudging the disciplinary limits of art, museology, and museum education. What is new about this turn and how does it transform museum practices? This essay aims to define a new interaction mode embodied by these productions by analyzing the historiographical corpus theorizing the movement. KEYWORDS: Educational Turn; contemporary art; interactivity; museum; postmodernismRésumé: « Educational turn », un terme qui, depuis dix ans, a su se faire connaître dans différents milieux de l’art contemporain et de la muséologie, tant chez les artistes que chez les conservateurs (Rogoff, 2008; O’Neill & Wilson (Eds.), 2010; Wilson & O’Neill, 2010; Wesseling (Ed.), 2011). Issu des avant-gardes artistiques de la deuxième moitié du 20e siècle, notamment de la critique institutionnelle et de l’esthétique relationnelle, il pose d’emblée la question des modalités d’interactivité de l’objet d’exposition, de la participation des publics et de la transmission des savoirs. Mais l’expression va plus loin puisque l’idée d’un « educational turn » prend non seulement ancrage dans une conception de l’œuvre d’art comme dispositif de médiation, mais aussi, pour reprendre l’expression de Podesva (2007), de l’éducation comme un médium artistique, brouillant les frontières disciplinaires de l’art, de la muséologie et de l’éducation muséale. En quoi ce tournant est-il nouveau et quelles transformations apporte-il à la pratique muséale ? À travers une analyse du corpus historiographique théorisant le mouvement, cet essai vise définir un nouveau mode d’interactivité incarné dans ces productions.MOTS CLES: Eductional Turn; art contemporain; interactivité; musée; postmodernité
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".