MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2619692691 · doi:10.26443/crae.v43i1.16

L’Educational Turn. L’éducation comme média artistique: À la recherche d’une interactivité nouvelle

2016· article· en· W2619692691 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Rébéca Lemay-Perreault

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of Art Education Research and Issues / Revue canadienne de recherches et enjeux en éducation artistique · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicVisual Culture and Art Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMuseologyHumanitiesArtContemporary artArt historySociologyVisual artsPerformance art

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: “Educational Turn”, an expression used for a decade by museology and various contemporary art environments, by artists as well as curators (Rogoff, 2008; O’Neill & Wilson (Eds.), 2010; Wilson & O’Neill, 2010; Wesseling (Ed.), 2011). Derived from artistic avant-garde tendencies of the second half of the 20th Century, including institutional critique and relational aesthetics, it immediately brings forward the issues of interactive modalities of the exhibited artwork, public participation, and knowledge dissemination. But this expression actually goes further since the concept of “educational turn” is not only rooted in the artwork as a mediation tool, but to cite Podesva (2007), in education as an artistic medium, fudging the disciplinary limits of art, museology, and museum education. What is new about this turn and how does it transform museum practices? This essay aims to define a new interaction mode embodied by these productions by analyzing the historiographical corpus theorizing the movement. KEYWORDS: Educational Turn; contemporary art; interactivity; museum; postmodernismRésumé: « Educational turn », un terme qui, depuis dix ans, a su se faire connaître dans différents milieux de l’art contemporain et de la muséologie, tant chez les artistes que chez les conservateurs (Rogoff, 2008; O’Neill & Wilson (Eds.), 2010; Wilson & O’Neill, 2010; Wesseling (Ed.), 2011). Issu des avant-gardes artistiques de la deuxième moitié du 20e siècle, notamment de la critique institutionnelle et de l’esthétique relationnelle, il pose d’emblée la question des modalités d’interactivité de l’objet d’exposition, de la participation des publics et de la transmission des savoirs. Mais l’expression va plus loin puisque l’idée d’un « educational turn » prend non seulement ancrage dans une conception de l’œuvre d’art comme dispositif de médiation, mais aussi, pour reprendre l’expression de Podesva (2007), de l’éducation comme un médium artistique, brouillant les frontières disciplinaires de l’art, de la muséologie et de l’éducation muséale. En quoi ce tournant est-il nouveau et quelles transformations apporte-il à la pratique muséale ? À travers une analyse du corpus historiographique théorisant le mouvement, cet essai vise définir un nouveau mode d’interactivité incarné dans ces productions.MOTS CLES: Eductional Turn; art contemporain; interactivité; musée; postmodernité

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.445
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.036 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of Art Education Research and Issues / Revue canadienne de recherches et enjeux en éducation artistiqueSame topicVisual Culture and Art TheoryFrench-language works237,207