Study of the Spatio-Temporal Parameters of the Gait of a Transtibial Amputee in Conditions of Alignment and Misalignment of the Prosthesis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of the temporal spatial parameters of gait indicates in detail the biomechanical magnitudes that manifest in the gait cycle (velocities, lengths, times, cadence) in the joints involved. Given the complexity of the study, the above parameters are studied from the perspective of alignment vs. the misalignment of a patient with a unilateral transtibial prosthesis in the sagittal and frontal plane with the base of the joint movements. This research evaluates the characteristics (magnitudes) of spontaneous velocity, steps length, stride time, cadence of steps taken from a Technaid motion capture equipment (MOCAP), from the cinematography of joint movements in hip, knee and ankle, using the Human March software which delivers the temporal space variables. This analysis was performed in an orthopedic and rehabilitation center. This research and software have been developed by the research group DIGITI of the District University.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it