MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2619757444

Effectiveness of adjuvant psychological therapy on alexithymia fatigue and affective dimensions among women with breast cancer

2017· dissertation· en· W2619757444 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sharon Ruth

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaToronto Alexithymia ScaleBreast cancerAnxietyClinical psychologyPsychologyAffect (linguistics)MoodDepression (economics)CancerMedicinePsychiatryInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psychological aspects in women with breast cancer are many. Among them are those related to what patients go through at different phases of treatment such as diagnosis, pre and post-surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Women with breast cancer experience psychological repercussions which are specific to them. Some of them are poor body image, self-depreciation, weight changes and hair loss can be distressing to women with breast cancer. The underlying cause could be a deficit in emotional processing and affect regulation. This could lead to an inability in verbalising and identifying feelings which is known as alexithymia. Closely related is the concept of fatigue which is subjective and tiredness which could last beyond treatments related to cancer. An overriding concept which could explain and understand these concepts is affect and mood. Towards this end the objective of the study was to examine the efficacy of adjuvant psychological therapy in breast cancer in terms of alexithymia, fatigue, depression, anxiety, stress and positive and negative affect. The study also explored if there was an association among alexithymia, fatigue, depression, anxiety, stress and negative affect. The study consisted of 20 patients in the intervention and control groups each. They were administered the following scales namely, Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Checklist of Individual Strength, Positive and Negative Affect Scale and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale. Towards the end of the sessions, they were administered Revised Sessions Reactions Scale. Adjuvant Psychological Therapy is a therapy tailor made for those with cancer which includes both cognitive and behavioral techniques. The results indicated that among the subscales and total alexithymia scores, there were statistically significant differences across three time-frames in the intervention group. Between the intervention and control groups, on total alexithymia, difficulty describing feelings and externally oriented thinking there was a statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups. On the subscale of difficulty identifying feelings there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in alexithymia and subscales in the control group. On fatigue, there was a statistically significant reduction in fatigue, concentration, motivation and physical activity among women with breast cancer following intervention and follow up. Between the intervention and control groups, there were statistically significant differences between the intervention and control group. On concentration, motivation and physical activity there were no statistically significant differences. There were no statistically significant differences in fatigue and aspects of fatigue (fatigue, concentration, motivation and physical activity) in the control group. On positive affect, there was no statistically significant difference in the intervention group across time frames. On negative affect, there were statistically significant differences across the time-frames. There were no statistically significant differences among women with breast cancer in the intervention group as compared to the control group on positive affect and negative affect. In the present study, there was no statistically significant difference in the control group on both positive and negative affect. In the present study, there were statistically significant differences across time-frames in depression, anxiety and stress among women with breast cancer following intervention. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups on depression, anxiety and stress. There were no statistically significant differences in depression, anxiety and stress in the control group. In correlational analysis, negative affect correlated with depression, anxiety and stress. Depression correlated with anxiety and stress. This study reveals the effectiveness of psychological interventions in those with breast cancer. It is imperative that psychological care is the need of the hour in oncology settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversitySame topicCancer survivorship and careFrench-language works237,207