Novel Treatment Approach to Contraversive Pushing after Acute Stroke: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this case report is to provide an alternative treatment approach to pushing behavior (PB), adapting widely used equipment for persons with stroke demonstrating such behaviour. The aim is to change their graviceptive experience during interventions while performing repeated stepping and righting practice to resolve PB more quickly. Client Description: The subject is a man aged 56 years who sustained a right middle-cerebral-artery ischemic stroke. He entered in-patient rehabilitation from an acute care hospital 7 days post-stroke. Intervention: Lateral stepping with body weight–supported treadmill training (LS-BWSTT) was used such that the subject stepped laterally toward the uninvolved side. Measures and Outcome: Scores on the Scale for Contraversive Pushing and the FIM were recorded at regular intervals. After intervention, the subject demonstrated decreased PB and improved function. Implications: The individual's PB improved after LS-BWSTT. LS-BWSTT is a novel treatment intervention that could be considered in future clinical decision making using evidence-based principles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".