« Jusqu’à ce qu'il plaise à La Reine d’en ordonner autrement…» ou l’obligation positive du gouvernement du Canada de favoriser et de promouvoir l’égalité des langues officielles à la ville d’Ottawa ('Until It Pleases Her Majesty to Order Otherwise' or the Positive Obligation of the Canadian Government to Encourage and Promote the Equality of Official Languages in the City of Ottawa)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
French Abstract: La presente etude porte sur l’obligation hypothetique du gouvernement federal de promouvoir l’egalite des langues officielles a la Ville d’Ottawa. Elle s’inscrit dans les revendications plus larges de la reconnaissance du francais et de l’anglais comme langues officielles de la Ville d’Ottawa a l’occasion du sesquicentenaire du Canada en 2017. Les municipalites relevent de la competence legislative des provinces. Les discussions dans ce dossier s’articulent ainsi autour du role de la Province de l’Ontario et de la Ville d’Ottawa. Les auteurs considerent important le fait de s’interroger sur le role eventuel du gouvernement federal dans la realisation de cet objectif. English Abstract: This study examines the federal government’s hypothetical obligation to promote the equality of official languages in the City of Ottawa. The study is part of the broader demands for the recognition of English and French as the official languages of the City of Ottawa on the occasion of Canada’s 150th anniversary in 2017. Municipalities fall under the provinces’ jurisdiction. Discussions on the recognition of Ottawa as a bilingual City have therefore been centered around the role of the Province of Ontario and the City of Ottawa. In that regard, the authors find it important to consider the possible role of the federal government in achieving this objective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".