Influence of Interphase Properties on the Behavior of Wavy Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CNTs (carbon nanotubes) are ideal reinforcing materials for high strength polymer nanocomposites because of their high stiffness, strength and resilience properties.CNT-matrix interface is one of the parameters effecting the stiffness of nanocomposites.In this study, the effect of CNT-matrix interface properties on the effective global stiffness of nanocomposites is investigated numerically.A representative volume element (RVE) is modeled by using the finite element method (FEM) to predict the elastic behavior in micro level.The finite element model consists of three phases namely matrix, CNT and interphase.The stiffness is obtained from the elastic response of RVE subjected to an axial loading.The stiffness values are obtained for several thickness and modulus values of the interface and the waviness of CNT.Effective global stiffness is calculated by using Mori-Tanaka method where CNTs have varying amount of waviness, interphase properties and random orientations.It is found that there are significant effects of the interface on the effective global stiffness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".