MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2619973475 · doi:10.1111/cts.12467

G‐CSF Indirectly Induces Apoptosis of Osteoblasts During Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization

2017· article· en· W2619973475 on OpenAlexaff
S.-D. Li, Y‐B Chen, L‐G Qiu, M‐Q Qin

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Translational Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsOsteocalcinOsteoblastHaematopoiesisBone marrowApoptosisEndocrinologyInternal medicineStem cellChemistryProgenitor cellOsteoclastDKK1Cell biologyBiologyMedicineSignal transductionAlkaline phosphataseIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to explore the mechanism underlying osteoblast suppression in the process of hematopoietic stem cells mobilization induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The apoptosis of human and mouse osteoblasts was examined by detecting caspase 3. The levels of serum DKK1 and osteocalcin in the supernatant of co-culture of mouse osteoblasts and mouse bone marrow nucleated cells were measured. The number of mouse osteoblasts co-cultured with mouse bone marrow nucleated cells was measured and the osteocalcin mRNA level was also measured. The G-CSF-induced decrease in osteoblast function was partly due to the apoptosis of osteoblasts. There was no significant difference in the level of serum DKK1 in healthy donors before and 5 days after mobilization. The osteocalcin gene and protein expression was significantly different in co-cultured osteoblasts with bone marrow nucleated cells treated with and without G-CSF. Osteoblasts undergo apoptosis during mobilization and G-CSF affects osteoblasts through bone marrow nucleated cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Translational ScienceSame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207