MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620034093 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2017.2708684

A Controlled Load Estimator-Based Energy Management System for Water Pumping Systems

2017· article· en· W2620034093 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Alarfaj, Kankar Bhattacharya

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersSaudi Aramco
KeywordsEstimatorEnergy management systemEnergy managementModel predictive controlTime horizonElectric power systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Mathematical optimizationArtificial neural networkPower (physics)Energy consumptionEngineeringEnergy (signal processing)Control engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development of a controlled load estimator for a water pumping system (WPS) using the data generated from a PSCAD simulation model. A neural network (NN) is trained, using the generated data, to estimate the power demand of the WPS as a function of the control variables. This NN-based load model is then incorporated into the WPS energy management system to determine the optimal operational schedules of the pumps with the objective of minimizing the energy consumption costs and charges associated with peak power demand. Modeling related uncertainties are captured through a novel recursive mechanism for NN retraining, while operational uncertainties are accounted for by applying a receding horizon model predictive control technique. Simulation results indicate notable savings in total energy costs for the WPS facility after applying the proposed strategy as a result of operational schedules optimization and uncertainties mitigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207