Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le croup est l’une des principales causes d’obstruction des voies respiratoires supérieures chez les jeunes enfants. Il se carac térise par l’apparition subite d’une toux aboyante, d’une raucité de la voix, d’un stridor inspiratoire et d’une détresse respiratoire attribuables à une inflammation des voies respiratoires supérieures découlant d’une infection virale. Selon les lignes directrices publiées sur le diagnostic et le traitement du croup, les stéroïdes devraient être le pilier du traitement de tous les enfants qui consultent à la salle d’urgence (SU) et présentent des symptômes du croup. La dexaméthasone, administrée par voie orale en dose unique de 0,6 mg/kg, est hautement efficace pour traiter les symptômes du croup. Malgré les données probantes qui appuient l’utilisation des stéroïdes comme pierre angulaire du traitement du croup, on constate d’importantes variations thérapeutiques chez les médecins qui traitent le croup à la SU. Le présent point de pratique porte sur la prise en charge du croup classique à la SU, en fonction des données probantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".