MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620140759 · doi:10.1107/s2056989017007642

Crystal structure of 2-azido-1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-1,3,2-diazaphospholidine

2017· article· en· W2620140759 on OpenAlexaff
Alex J. Veinot, Amber D. Blair, Jason D. Masuda

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystal structures of chemical compounds
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAzideRing (chemistry)Dihedral angleCrystal structureCrystallographySteric effectsCrystal (programming language)ChelationAtom (system on chip)BenzeneTetrahydrofuranSodium azideMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryMoleculeHydrogen bondInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P, was synthesized by reacting 2-chloro-1,3-bis-(2,6-diiso-propyl-phen-yl)-1,3,2-di-aza-phospho-lidine with sodium azide and a catalytic amount of lithium chloride in tetra-hydro-furan. The title compound is the first structurally characterized 2-azido-1,3,2-di-aza-phospho-lidine and exhibits a P atom in a trigonal pyramidal geometry. The azide P-N bond length of 1.8547 (16) Å is significantly longer than the P-N separations for the chelating di-amine [P-N = 1.6680 (15) and 1.6684 (14) Å]. The sterically hindered 2,6-diiso-propyl-phenyl groups twist away from the central heterocycle, with dihedral angles between the central heteocyclic ring and benzene rings of 76.17 (10) and 79.74 (9)°. In the crystal, a weak C-H⋯N link to the terminal N atom of the azide group leads to [100] chains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0070.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicCrystal structures of chemical compoundsFrench-language works237,207