MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620189500

Cutting EdgE Sovereign Credit Risk in a Hidden Markov Regime- Switching Framework. Part 2

2013· article· en· W2620189500 on OpenAlexfundno aff
L. Potgieter, Gianluca Fusai

Bibliographic record

VenueCity Research Online (City University London) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCredit Risk and Financial Regulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBNP Paribas CardifUniversität ZürichWharton School, University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of PennsylvaniaYork UniversityBanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria
KeywordsMarkov chainEconometricsCredit riskTransformation (genetics)EconomicsSovereigntyActuarial scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionMarkov processComputer scienceMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMachine learning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research applies a discrete-time Markov-modulated model to default probability estimation and adapts it to Merton’s contingent claims approach, backing the hypothesis that a regime-switching framework which allows for structural shifts can substantially improve the underestimation of default probabilities associated with the Merton structural model. The modeling apparatus is applied to sovereign risk. proving that the methodology can be tractably extended to a contingent claims approach, and is investigated as a follow-up paper to an extensive methodology found in the previous edition of the Capco Journal of Financial Transformation (37) [Potgieter and Fusai (2013)]. CDS quotes are used to calibrate the regime switching model and are then used to estimate sovereign assets in both developed and emerging markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCity Research Online (City University London)Same topicCredit Risk and Financial RegulationsFrench-language works237,207