MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Role of Oxidative Stress in Modulating Cutaneous Vasodilation and Sweating During Exercise in Type-2 Diabetes

2017· article· en· W2620252872 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pegah Akbari, Naoto Fujii, Sheila Dervis, Robert D. Meade, Pierre Boulay, Ronald J. Sigal, Glen P. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrodialysisType 2 diabetesMedicineNitric oxideSWEATOxidative stressVasodilationInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impairments in heat dissipation in individuals with Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2D) have been observed during exercise in warm ambient conditions. This decline in heat loss may be related to diminished bioavailability of nitric oxide, an important contributor to the heat loss responses, due to increased oxidative stress. PURPOSE: To assess if local administration of ascorbate (ASC, a non-selective anti-oxidant) increases local heat loss responses of cutaneous vasodilation (CVC) and sweating during exercise in the heat in individuals with T2D. METHODS: Older adults (62 ± 9 yrs) with (n=10, T2D) and without (n=10, NoT2D) T2D, matched for age, body surface area and fitness performed 30-min of moderate-to-high intensity cycling (70% of VO2peak), followed by a 20-min recovery in the heat (35°C). Local CVC and sweat rate were assessed at four skin sites continuously perfused via intradermal microdialysis with either: 1) lactated Ringer (Control), 2) 10 mM ASC, 3) 10 mM NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, a non-selective NOS inhibitor), or 4) a combination of ASC+ L-NAME. Responses were compared at baseline, end-exercise and end of recovery. RESULTS: In both T2D and NoT2D participants, CVC did not differ from Control at the ASC site throughout the protocol (all P≥0.18). In T2D, CVC at the L-NAME site was attenuated throughout the protocol relative to Control with reductions of 17%, 16% and 16%, during baseline, end-exercise and end of recovery, respectively (all P≤0.05). In NoT2D, attenuations in CVC at the L-NAME site consisted of 18%, 29% and 23% from Control at the same respective time periods (all P≤0.01). In T2D, CVC was attenuated at the combination site relative to Control throughout (baseline: 20%, end-exercise: 27% and end of recovery: 23%) (all P≤0.01). Conversely, in NoT2D the combination of ASC+L-NAME attenuated CVC during baseline (14%, P=0.01) and recovery (20%, P=0.01) only. No differences in sweat rate were observed between Control and any treatment site in either group (all P≥0.10). CONCLUSION: We show that oxidative stress does not impair CVC or sweating in T2D. Further, reducing oxidative stress in the presence of NOS inhibition in NoT2D alters other mechanisms in the regulation of CVC, however this response is not observed in adults with T2D. Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207