MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620256628 · doi:10.1093/pasj/psx080

The Hyper Suprime-Cam software pipeline

2017· article· en· W2620256628 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersPlanetary Science DivisionJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceScience Mission DirectorateSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieToray Science FoundationHigh Energy Accelerator Research OrganizationNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanNational Central UniversityMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyQueen's UniversityCabinet Office, Government of JapanSpace Telescope Science InstituteLos Alamos National LaboratoryPrinceton UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemAcademia SinicaCalifornia Institute of TechnologyJapan Science and Technology AgencySmithsonian InstitutionU.S. Department of EnergyJet Propulsion LaboratoryQueen's University BelfastNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDurham UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPipeline (software)SoftwareData processingImage processingProcessingSubaru Telescope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we describe the optical imaging data processing pipeline developed for the Subaru Telescope’s Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) instrument. The HSC Pipeline builds on the prototype pipeline being developed by the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope’s Data Management system, adding customizations for HSC, large-scale processing capabilities, and novel algorithms that have since been reincorporated into the LSST codebase. While designed primarily to reduce HSC Subaru Strategic Program (SSP) data, it is also the recommended pipeline for reducing general-observer HSC data. The HSC pipeline includes high-level processing steps that generate coadded images and science-ready catalogs as well as low-level detrending and image characterizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations486
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Astronomical Society of JapanSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207