MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620271389 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2016-0592

Oblique ion acoustic excitations in an ultra-relativistic degenerate dense magnetoplasma

2017· article· en· W2620271389 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ataur Rahman, Anisa Qamar, S. Naseer, S. Neelam Naeem

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDegenerate energy levelsPseudopotentialSolitonDispersion relationMach numberElectronIonPlasmaMagnetic fieldAmplitudeIon acoustic waveQuantum electrodynamicsComputational physicsNonlinear systemAtomic physicsClassical mechanicsCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The linear and nonlinear propagation of ion acoustic waves is considered in a degenerate magnetoplasma, composed of relativistic degenerate electrons and an inertial ion fluid. A linear dispersion relation is derived in the linear approximation. The Sagdeev pseudopotential approach is used to investigate the properties of arbitrary amplitude, obliquely propagating ion acoustic solitary waves. The expression for the lower and upper Mach numbers for the existence of magnetized ion acoustic solitons has also been derived. The significant influence on the properties of soliton structures of relevant physical parameters, such as the plasma number density, the obliqueness (the angle between soliton propagation direction and magnetic field), and the soliton speed is also investigated. At the end, analytical results are supplemented through numerical analysis by using typical representative parameters consistent with degenerate and ultra-relativistic magnetoplasmas of astrophysical regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicDust and Plasma Wave PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207