MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620369605 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31429-0

Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial

2017· article· en· W2620369605 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Nash, Bruce Kirkham, Masato Okada, Proton Rahman, Gerd‐Ruediger Burmester, David Adams, Lisa Kerr, Chin Lee, Catherine L Shuler, Mark C. Genovese, Khalid Ahmed, Jeffrey Alper, N Barkham, Ralph E. Bennett, Francisco J. Blanco, Howard Blumstein, Michael S. Brooks, Gerd‐Rüdiger Burmester, Patricia Cagnoli, Paul H. Caldron, Alain Cantagrel, Der‐Yuan Chen, Melvin Churchill, Christine E. Codding, Peter M.G. Deane, José Del Giudice, Atul Deodhar, Rajat K. Dhar, Eva Dokoupilová, Rita M. Egan, Andrea Everding, E. Galíndez, David H. Goddard, Alice B. Gottlieb, Philippe Goupille, Robert Griffin, Ramesh C. Gupta, Stephen Hall, Kalpita Hatti, Mary P. Howell, Yu‐Huei Huang, Ramina Jajoo, Namieta M. Janssen, Uta Kiltz, Alan Kivitz, Steven J. Klein, Mariusz Korkosz, Roshan Kotha, Joel M. Kremer, C Lue, José Luís Marenco de la Fuente, Helena Marzo‐Ortega, Philip J. Mease, Pier Luigi Meroni, Eric C. Mueller, Anupama Nandagudi, Antonio Fernández‐Nebro, C. Michael Neuwelt, Ana‐Maria Orbai, Meera R. Oza, Deborah L. Parks, Debendra Pattanaik, Maria Rell‐Bakalarska, David Rosmarin, Euthalia Roussou, Anna I. Rychlewska-Hanczewksa, David Sikes, Michael T. Stack, Prashanth Sunkureddi, Hasan Tahir, Diamant Thaçi, Tsen‐Fang Tsai, Anthony Turkiewicz, L. Unger, Raúl Veiga Cabello, Ulf Wagner, Alvin F. Wells, Peter Youssef, Agnieszka Zielińska

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsPsoriatic arthritisMedicineIxekizumabDouble blindPlaceboArthritisPsoriasisPlacebo-controlled studyInternal medicineDermatologyAlternative medicinePathologySecukinumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations405
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe LancetSame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207