MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2620460578

STUDY AND ANALYSIS FOR PRECEPITATE DUST PARTICLES IN RESIDENTIAL SECTOR AT AL-NAJAF AL-ASHRAF CITY

2014· article· en· W2620460578 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hussein Abdulmuttaleb Ali khan

Bibliographic record

VenueKufa journal of Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)Wind speedRelative humidityGeographyHumidityAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyPhysical geographyArchaeologyGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper has been carried out to study the precipitate dust particles in residential area at Al-Najaf Al-  Ashraf city, with special site of Alsaad quarter. It also studied the impact of the most important climatic characteristics ( such as temperatures, wind speed, humidity and evaporation, and rain) with rate affecting the collection the dust particles and to identify the levels of generation at the city. Also the climatic properties of city had been analyzed that resulted in Knowing the range of dust collected. And to identify the environmental impact of the collecting precipitate dust particles, samples were taken at Alsaad quarter by using metal cylinder, for three years from 2007 until 2009,  at monthly rate for each sample. The most important results of this paper are the seasonal changes of the climate with anthropogenic activities accompanied by seasonal changes in dust quantities. Finally, the conclusions and recommendations which help the reducing of the risks of this important problem were presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKufa journal of Engineering→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→