MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

OFICINA VIDA EMOCIONAL: repercussões no bem-estar subjetivo de adolescentes

2017· article· pt· W2620483593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCadernos de Pesquisa · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth, Drugs, and Violence
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyEmotional regulationHumanitiesClinical psychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A presente pesquisa quantitativa objetivou desenvolver a Oficina Vida Emocional e avaliar os seus impactos nos participantes, por meio da medição dos afetos positivos e negativos, de um grupo de 12 discentes (grupo experimental) do 9º ano do EF, de uma escola pública de Porto Alegre, comparados com um controle (n= 28). Ao compararmos os resultados das médias dos estudantes, antes e depois da Oficina, verificamos que o grupo experimental, no Pós-teste, teve aumento significativo nas médias nos Afetos Positivos (AP). Nos Afetos Negativos (AN) houve modificação na direção esperada reduzindo, embora não tenha sido significativa. Inferimos, que os adolescentes melhoraram seus níveis de Bem-Estar Subjetivo, na dimensão emocional, pois tiveram aumento nas médias dos AP e redução nas médias dos AN, após a participação na Oficina Vida Emocional.Palavras-chave: Educação emocional. Adolescentes. Escola. Afetos positivos e negativos. Bem-estar subjetivo.EMOTIONAL LIFE WORKSHOP: repercussions on subjective well-being of adolescents Abstract: This quantitative research aimed to develop the Emotional Life Workshop and assess their impacts on participants, through the measurement of positive and negative affect, of a group of 12 students (experimental group) of the 9th grade of Middle School, of a public school in Porto Alegre, compared with a control (n = 28). Comparing the results of the averages of students before and after the workshop, we find that the experimental group in the post-test had a significant increase in the average Positive Affects (PA). In Negative Affects (NA) there was a change in the expected direction, although it was not significant. We infer that teens have improved their levels of subjective well-being, emotional dimension, because had increase in averages of PA and reduction in the average of NA, after participating in the Emotional Life Workshop.Keywords: Emotional education. Adolescents. School. Positive and negative affections. Subjective well-being. TALLER VIDA EMOCIONAL: impacto en el bienestar subjetivo de adolescentesResumen: Esta investigación cuantitativa pretende desarrollar el taller de vida emocional y evaluar su impacto en los participantes, a través de la medición del afecto positivo y negativo, de un grupo de 12 alumnos (grupo experimental) de 9 º año de lo EF, una escuela pública en Porto Alegre, en comparación con un control (n = 28). Comparar los resultados de los promedios de los estudiantes antes y después del taller, nos encontramos con que el grupo experimental en la prueba post, tenía un aumento significativo en el promedio de los afectos positivos (AP). En el afecto negativo (AN) hubo cambios en la dirección esperada, aunque no fue significativa. Deducimos, que los adolescentes mejoraron sus niveles de bienestar subjetivo, dimensión afectiva, porque había aumento en el promedio de AP y reducción en el promedio del AN, después de la participación en el taller La vida emocional.Palabras clave: Educación emocional. Adolescentes. Escuela. Afectos positivos y negativos. Bienestar subjetivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it