Enhanced Sympathoexcitatory and Pressor Responses to Chronic Central Sodium Loading in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Vs. -Resistent Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
P46 Increased responsiveness to increases in CSF Na + by high salt intake may contribute to salt-sensitive hypertension in Dahl S rats. To test this hypothesis, Dahl S and R rats received a chronic icv infusion of artificial CSF (aCSF) or aCSF containing 0.8 M Na + (5 μl/hr) for 14 days, using osmotic minipumps. On day 14 in conscious rats, CSF was sampled and BP, HR and renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) were recorded at rest and in response to air stress, icv α 2 -adrenoceptor agonist guanabenz (50 μg), icv ouabain (0.6 μg), and iv phenylephrine and nitropusside to estimate baroreflex function. Data are mean±SEM (n=8-13). *p + caused more severe hypertension, larger responses to air stress and guanabenz, and more blunting of the arterial baroreflex gain in S vs R rats. These findings suggest that enhanced neuronal responsiveness to CSF Na + is one of the mechanisms contributing to salt-sensitive hypertension in Dahl S rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".