MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620520238 · doi:10.22067/jcmr.v8i2.56120

Association of Codon 72 of P53 Gene Polymorphism with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Case Control Study

2016· article· en· W2620520238 on OpenAlexaff
Sina Gerayli, Alireza Pasdar, Sina Rostami, Samaneh Sepahi, Seyed Mousalreza Hoseini, Reza Jahanian, Aida Gholoobi, Zahra Meshkat, Mitra Ahadi

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersMashhad University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsVirologyGeneBiologyVirusMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single nucleotide polymorphism in codon 72 of p53 gene (Arg/Pro) changes p53 protein structure and affects its activities. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is believed to induce hepatocellular carcinoma and P53 polymorphisms have been associated with human cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic variants of codon 72 of p53 gene polymorphism in HCV patients and its relationship with HCV infection. The study was conducted on 67 HCV patients, who were referred to medical centers of Mashhad city, Iran, and 73 healthy people from the same region. Genotyping of codon 72 of p53 gene was performed by PCR-RFLP method. The distributions of different alleles of p53 polymorphisms did not differ significantly between groups. The respective proportions of Proline homozygotes, heterozygotes, and Arginine homozygotes were 37.31%, 35.82%, 26.86% in patients and 39.72%, 27.39%, and 32.87% in the control group respectively. However, we found no significant differenece for the allelic or genotype distribution between cases and controls. Our results indicated no strong evidence of association of the p53 polymorphism with HCV infection; however, further investigation is needed in different ethnic groups to elucidate the role of this polymorphism in HCV infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiologySame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207