MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620578829

Plex de Montréal : portrait et singularités des logements caractéristiques montréalais

2017· article· fr· W2620578829 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Chaumont

Bibliographic record

VenueINRIA a CCSD electronic archive server · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce mémoire s’intéresse à l’habitat de type plex, logements multifamiliaux de plusieurs étages, caractéristique du logement à Montréal. Il retrace l’histoire de ce mode d’habiter qui s’est développé du milieu du XIXe siècle au XXe siècle pour répondre à une forte demande de logements locatifs. Afin de renta¬biliser toujours plus le foncier et de mettre à disposition tou¬jours plus de logements aux migrants, des nouvelles typolo¬gies de logements apparaissent : les duplex, triplex et autres cinq-plex. Le mémoire s’intéresse aux singularités de cette typologie qui ont permis de faire perdu¬rer ces modèles, toujours appréciés aujourd’hui. Plusieurs exemples de ré¬habilitation menés par trois agences montréalaises sont également présentés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINRIA a CCSD electronic archive serverSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207