MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2620580579 · doi:10.5539/jsd.v10n3p250

Clean Energy Efficiency of Vernacular-Traditional Architectural Indicators for the Development of Sustainable Tourism

2017· article· en· W2620580579 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Farid Ghasemi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Development · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Cultural Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismVernacularArchitectureVernacular architectureSustainable developmentClean energyBusinessEnergy (signal processing)Natural resource economicsEfficient energy useEnvironmental economicsArchitectural engineeringEconomyEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementEconomicsGeographyPolitical scienceEcologyEngineeringMathematicsLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the decades, due to the different crises, in which people are involved, they are trying to remove these big challenges with their dynamic mind. The consecutive changes in climatic conditions on one hand and energy crises on the other hand have affected human life every moment. It seems that through considering the attitudes to clean energies and their efficiency through inspiring past experiences in a combination of past and present time can not only show response to the coming problems, but also it can cover some parts of economic considerations. Tourism industry that has been considered for many years as one of the sustainable economic aspects can be valuable base for the said combination. This study tends to introduce a triangle of sustainable origins of tourism based on 3 mentioned factors including decline of energy resources, vernacular-traditional architecture experiences and tourism industry. According to the mentioned, it is necessary to implement some plans in way of use of nature of clean energies with approach of sustainable development and create some powerful foundations for this purpose through an overview of Iran's traditional architecture, which has paid specific attention to climate and the designations and constructions have been based on climatic approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable DevelopmentSame topicArchitecture and Cultural InfluencesFrench-language works237,207